Your Oxacillin-Rivals Does Not Want You To Read This

We first assessed whether math skill predicted overall speed on Transfer task in a regression analysis. Math skill was not a significant predictor, F(1,68) = 0.520, p = 0.520, R2adjusted= -0.007, �� = -0.087, t(68) = -0.72, p = 0.473. We added condition next to general math skill as a predictor for speed on transfer task into the stepwise regression model. The overall model-fit was not significant, F(2,67) = 1.699, p = 0.395, R2adjusted= 0.020. Math skill remained a non-significant predictor, �� = -0.102, t(67) = -0.856, p = 0.395, RPartial = -0.104, and condition was a non-significant predictor on solving speed on the transfer task, �� = 0.202, t(67) = 1.692, p = 0.095, RPartial = 0.202. We obtained no significant results when entering an interaction term after math skill and condition. Speed�CAccuracy LY2109761 cell line Trade-off For exploratory purposes we assessed whether a speed�Caccuracy trade-off could be detected using the inverse efficiency measure (IES; Townsend and Ashby, 1978), IES = . As a reminder, a higher score entails a more extreme association of speed and accuracy, where slower reaction times are associated with a higher proportion Oxacillin of correct responses, or faster reaction times with a higher proportion of incorrect responses. Overall mean IES for the transfer task was 674.41 s (SD = 256.94). Three participants�� scores fell above 2 SDs above the mean (>1188; no scores EPZ5676 in vitro being associated with a lower inverse efficiency score. Adding condition as a predictor next to math skill slightly improved the overall model fit, F(2,68) = 4.234, p = 0.018, R2adjusted = 0.085, with math skill remaining a significant predictor of IES, �� = -0.269, t(68) = -2.356 p = 0.021, RPartial = -0.275, but condition was a non-significant predictor of IES, �� = 0.179, t(68) = 1.726 p = 0.089, RPartial = 0.205. Subsequently we added the interaction term next to math skill and condition, which substantially improved the overall model fit, F(3,67) = 5.077, p = 0.003, R2adjusted = 0.149. In this more predictive moderation model, math skill no longer had a significant main effect on IES, �� = 0.011, t(67) = 0.071, p = 0.