Tips About How To End Up Being Great At FTY720

Therefore, we examined the effect of altering HO-1 expression and/or HO-1 activity on M.abs growth inside infected macrophages. As shown in Fig.?3, inhibiting HO-1 activity with SnPP significantly (pPhosphoprotein phosphatase cell cultures 24?h before infection, and added again after the infection until the time of cell collection. However, when SnPP was added at the time of infection, no inhibition of M.abs click here growth was observed (not shown). Furthermore, SnPP had no effect on M.abs phagocytosis as evidenced by a similar level of CFU on day 0 post-infection (data not shown). This suggests that the impact of HO-1 activity on M.abs growth is due to a process that occurs early after infection of the host cell. To rule out any inhibitory effects of SnPP on M.abs or THP-1 cells, cells and bacteria were cultured in the presence of different concentrations of SnPP and monitored for toxicity. As shown in Fig.?3, no toxic effects were observed on either the THP-1 cells (B) or on the bacteria (C) when cultured with SnPP, as determined by the MTT test or OD600 absorbance, respectively. To further confirm our results and ensure that no toxic concentrations of SnPP were used, cells viability was assessed by flow cytometer in the presence of 7-AAD. No significant toxicity of SnPP, was seen in either control or M.abs-infected THP-1 cells at 24?h (not shown). Moreover, when similar experiments were performed in the presence of different concentrations of the HO-1 inducer CoPP, no significant increase in M.abs CFU were detected above untreated control, as shown in Fig.?3D (p>0.05). To further confirm our results, we inhibited HO-1 by HO-1 siRNA. Inhibiting HO-1 expression by HO-1 HSP90 activation siRNA suppressed M.abs growth inside macrophage-differentiated THP-1 cells as demonstrated in Fig.?3E (p