Time Saving Procedures Regarding MS-275
The inclusion criteria were women about to become mothers for the first time, being in full time or 75% employment, intending to return to work after maternity leave, low-risk pregnancy, age over 20 years, living with their partner, and being able to speak Norwegian. The data collection in the three initial studies was based on unstructured individual GDC-0449 datasheet interviews (cf. [48]). The studies were part of a larger qualitative, explorative, and descriptive study of the reproductive health of employed women in Norway [49]. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. The studies were approved by the Norwegian Regional Committee for Research Ethics (number 094.07) and the Norwegian Social Science Data Services (number 16725). 3.3. Data Collection Qualitative data from three datasets on employed women were reanalysed [43�C45]. The datasets comprised 28 depersonalised transcripts produced by one of Quinapyramine the authors (Marit Alstveit) in 2008 and 2009. The second and third authors were familiar with the original studies (cf. [50]). The first dataset [43] exploring employed pregnant women's experiences of work during pregnancy and expectations of becoming a mother for the first time comprised ten transcripts. The second dataset [44] consisted of nine transcripts of interviews exploring first-time mothers' experiences of social relationships during maternity leave. The third dataset [45] comprised nine transcripts from interviews exploring first-time mothers' return to work. 3.4. Data Analysis The secondary analysis was conducted by utilising data from the three datasets and was supplementary in the sense of investigating aspects that were not central in the original research (cf. [41, 51]). A systematic interpretive process was employed to develop an understanding by means of questioning and answering, that is, a back and forth movement between the parts and the whole (cf. [40, 52]). When reading and interpreting the datasets, the theoretical salutogenic concepts of GRRs and SOC [37, 38] were employed to achieve a hermeneutic horizon. In a deductive way MS-275 ic50 (cf. [53]) while trying to be open-minded, we searched the datasets for material that described the women's health resources and strategies. After interpretation and sorting, meaning units with common elements were formulated into subthemes and then grouped and abstracted into themes (cf. [54]). This was a dialectic process between the datasets from each of the studies, the subthemes, themes, concepts of salutogenic theory, and our preunderstanding [40, 52]. Finally a synthesis emerged which is reported in the present study. 3.5. Trustworthiness The process of refining and validating the findings involved collaboration between all the researchers (cf. [42]).
