Six Factors Howcome Oxygenase Is simply Definitely Better In Comparison With Its Competitors

EOL and COL provide an application programming interface (API) that I used to access the data (Table ?(Table1).1). NU7441 TPL on the other hand does not offer an API thus was accessed through TPL-DB. Table 1. API functions and data output format of data sources. Taxonomic status In addition to the verification of a name, its taxonomic status was retrieved using TPL and COL. Both sources use two slightly different status terminologies. While COL offers 3 distinct status types (""Accepted name"", ""Provisionally accepted name"" and ""Synonym""), TPL offers 4 status types (""Accepted"", ""Synonym"", ""Unresolved"" and ""Misapplied""). To have a unique scheme, status information of COL was adapted to that of TPL by considering ""Accepted name"" and ""Provisionally accepted name"" as status type ""Accepted"". The status ""Ambiguous"" was introduced by the author as indicator for scientific names with different authorship (homonyms) or very similar spelling variants. In detail (Fig. ?(Fig.11?1b),b), taxonomic status information provided by COL and TPL was retrieved in two steps. First, only exact name matches were used. In case more than one exact match was returned the respective status was set to ��Ambiguous��. Secondly, all names that did not return any result (NA) were re-evaluated by retrieving all names related to the next higher hierarchical level (i.e. species in case of infraspecific epithets or genus in case of species names). If any of the returned Oxygenase names was an exact match or very similar (i.e. Levenshtein distance Akt inhibitor combined and the status of each unique name was compared. The status was either identical or not. In the latter case the comparison was saved and used to summarise types of discrepancies. Conservation - IUCN Red List status The list of unique verified taxon names was used to determine the IUCN Red List status for each taxon. First, plant data was downloaded from the IUCN website and installed in a local database. Second, the database was queried and status information was saved. In case a UNL name was not found among the primary names of IUCN, alternative names (i.e. the accepted name and all synonyms of the UNL name) provided by TPL were used to query the database.