17-DMAG Was Absurdly Easy Previously, But These Days It Is Impossible

41 (cooperation 1), 0.71 (cooperation 2), 0.74 (competition 1), 0.78 (competition 2), and 1.11 (fun task). These mean z values are identical to effect sizes (Cohen��s d), i.e., selleck inhibitor they demonstrate moderate to strong effects. When the five interaction conditions are collapsed in three conditions, mean z values were 0.56 (cooperation), 0.76 (competition), and 1.11 (fun task). The fun task showed a significantly higher synchrony than both competition (p synchrony were all significantly different from each other (p selleck products was no general increase or decrease of synchrony over time in the initial four interactions whose sequence was randomized. HYPOTHESIS 2 Hierarchical linear models were computed for positive affect (Table ?Table22) and negative affect (Table ?Table33). Individual affect ratings were used. In both tables, model 2 refers to the modulation of affect by the dyad��s synchrony alone. As expected, it was found that nonverbal synchrony positively predicted positive affect (t = 3.65, p Oxalosuccinic acid HYPOTHESIS 3 Hierarchical linear models were computed for nonverbal synchrony (dependent variable) explained by positive affect prior to the respective interaction and by positive affect after this interaction; affect ratings were the averages of the two dyad members in the interaction (Table ?Table44, Model a). The procedure was repeated with negative affect prior to, and after, an interaction (Table ?Table44, Model b). We found that positive affect after the interactions was a significant effect in the model (t = 2.52, p -0.16, p = 0.87). Negative affect after the interactions was likewise significant in Model b (t = -1.98, p