<difference-title>
m |
m |
||
Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
− | + | Assurances were given to all elderly that their information would be kept [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thymidine_kinase Thymidine kinase] completely confidential. In the current study, assured to subjects that their information will remain confidential. RESULTS A total of 502 questionnaires were completed by the elderly subjects. The mean age of the subjects was 66.3 �� 5.3 years. About 48% (241 subjects) of them were men, and 52% (261 subjects) were female. Other demographic information details of the subjects are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Participant characteristics (n=502) In order to have a sufficient number of samples for use in factor analysis, the KMO value was obtained as 0.943. The approved number of samples and also the significance obtained by the Bartlett's test was along with fit indices for the revised HPLP-II version, are given in the table [Table 2]. Table 2 The six-factor measurement model of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II items and its fit indices The CVI for the construct on interpersonal relationships was 0.86; for healthy eating, 0.84; for taking health responsibility, 0.84; for physical activity, 0.82; for stress management, 0.82; for spiritual growth, 0.83; and for total questions, it was 0.84. In investigating the face validity, the [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-737.html ABT-737 in vivo] questionnaire was given to 20 elderly people as a pilot, and at this [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Nutlin-3.html selleck chemical] stage, some modifications were made. For example, in Questions 3, 15, and 39, the term ��health team�� was replaced by ��health staff.�� Question 9 (��I follow programs related to health through watching TV or reading��) was modified to ��I follow programs related to health through watching TV or reading ��Teletext.�� Cronbach's alpha values indicate good internal consistency of the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha for HPLP-II was measured as 0.78. For all subscales of the questionnaire, it was in the range of 0.73�C0.84. All subscales within HPLPII had a direct and significant correlation with others (0.64>r>0.40). In other hand, these subscales had direct and significant correlation with the revised HPLP-II version (0.51 |
Version du 16 novembre 2016 à 00:58
Assurances were given to all elderly that their information would be kept Thymidine kinase completely confidential. In the current study, assured to subjects that their information will remain confidential. RESULTS A total of 502 questionnaires were completed by the elderly subjects. The mean age of the subjects was 66.3 �� 5.3 years. About 48% (241 subjects) of them were men, and 52% (261 subjects) were female. Other demographic information details of the subjects are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Participant characteristics (n=502) In order to have a sufficient number of samples for use in factor analysis, the KMO value was obtained as 0.943. The approved number of samples and also the significance obtained by the Bartlett's test was along with fit indices for the revised HPLP-II version, are given in the table [Table 2]. Table 2 The six-factor measurement model of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II items and its fit indices The CVI for the construct on interpersonal relationships was 0.86; for healthy eating, 0.84; for taking health responsibility, 0.84; for physical activity, 0.82; for stress management, 0.82; for spiritual growth, 0.83; and for total questions, it was 0.84. In investigating the face validity, the ABT-737 in vivo questionnaire was given to 20 elderly people as a pilot, and at this selleck chemical stage, some modifications were made. For example, in Questions 3, 15, and 39, the term ��health team�� was replaced by ��health staff.�� Question 9 (��I follow programs related to health through watching TV or reading��) was modified to ��I follow programs related to health through watching TV or reading ��Teletext.�� Cronbach's alpha values indicate good internal consistency of the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha for HPLP-II was measured as 0.78. For all subscales of the questionnaire, it was in the range of 0.73�C0.84. All subscales within HPLPII had a direct and significant correlation with others (0.64>r>0.40). In other hand, these subscales had direct and significant correlation with the revised HPLP-II version (0.51