<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="fr">
		<id>http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lex_Machina</id>
		<title>Lex Machina - Historique des versions</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Lex_Machina"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?title=Lex_Machina&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-06-05T19:04:40Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Historique pour cette page sur le wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.20alpha</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?title=Lex_Machina&amp;diff=49861&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Epochsingle4 : Page créée avec « Attorneys now can datamine millions of documents with a focus on comments and actions by judges to determine predictability. Lex Machina, Ravel Law, Bloomberg Law and othe... »</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?title=Lex_Machina&amp;diff=49861&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2016-12-21T11:30:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Page créée avec « Attorneys now can datamine millions of documents with a focus on comments and actions by judges to determine predictability. Lex Machina, Ravel Law, Bloomberg Law and othe... »&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nouvelle page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Attorneys now can datamine millions of documents with a focus on comments and actions by judges to determine predictability. Lex Machina, Ravel Law, Bloomberg Law and other new big data services are some of the providers of these tools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Big data now provides lawyers statistics on average wait times before a trial or chances of a case being dismissed under a particular judge. Since 2011 for example, motions by San Francisco based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston were examined. 48% of the time she dismissed in full. Denials for motions in full were 24.5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economics of this are game changing. It eliminates hours of monotonous research given to [http://vlamingeninzurich.ch/forum/discussion/98555/litigation-funding#Item_1 junior lawyers] or law librarians. The tools now allow these individuals to do far more than was possible from their previous assignments.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Epochsingle4</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>