<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="fr">
		<id>http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Funds_Saving_Guidelines_For_Obeticholic_Acid</id>
		<title>Funds Saving Guidelines For Obeticholic Acid - Historique des versions</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Funds_Saving_Guidelines_For_Obeticholic_Acid"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?title=Funds_Saving_Guidelines_For_Obeticholic_Acid&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-07-08T13:39:02Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Historique pour cette page sur le wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.20alpha</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?title=Funds_Saving_Guidelines_For_Obeticholic_Acid&amp;diff=78209&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Notekey15 : Page créée avec « ALCPS performed best, with the largest area under the ROC curve in predicting 3-month OS (sensitivity 76.32%, specificity 78.72%). CLIP and CUPI were similar to ALCPS in p... »</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.feuxdelamour.com/v4/index.php?title=Funds_Saving_Guidelines_For_Obeticholic_Acid&amp;diff=78209&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2017-03-14T12:23:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Page créée avec « ALCPS performed best, with the largest area under the ROC curve in predicting 3-month OS (sensitivity 76.32%, specificity 78.72%). CLIP and CUPI were similar to ALCPS in p... »&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nouvelle page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;ALCPS performed best, with the largest area under the ROC curve in predicting 3-month OS (sensitivity 76.32%, specificity 78.72%). CLIP and CUPI were similar to ALCPS in prognostic discrimination but with relatively lower power. ALCPS, CLIP and CUPI are the preferred scoring systems in the prediction [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Adriamycin.html see more] of OS and 3-month survival among the 12 systems analyzed, and should be used as inclusion criteria in clinical trials for advanced HCC patients. &amp;quot;&amp;quot;To evaluate tumor markers as prognostic factors in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. Between January 2000 and December 2008, 1178 patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer were assayed for expression of three serum tumor markers, CA 19-9, CA 72-4 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), prior to the initiation of first-line chemotherapy. Elevated serum concentrations of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 (&amp;gt;37?U/mL), CA 72-4 (&amp;gt;4?U/mL) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (&amp;gt;6?ng/mL) were observed in 38, 56 and 33% of patients, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that elevated serum concentration of each of the three markers, CA 19-9 (P?=?0.001), CA 72-4 (P?=?0.001) and CEA (P?=?0.030), was significantly associated [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/obeticholic-acid.html this website] with poor patient prognosis. However, multivariate analysis showed that an elevated CA 19-9 concentration only was significantly associated with shorter survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08�C1.37, P?=?0.002). In the good risk and moderate risk groups, previously defined by clinical factors alone, survival was significantly lower in patients with elevated CA 19-9 (P?[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FARP1 FARP1] cancer among Australian Indigenous people overall. This study aimed to investigate patterns of care and survival between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians with CRC. Through a matched-cohort design we compared 80 Indigenous and 85 non-Indigenous people all diagnosed with CRC and treated in Queensland public hospitals during 1998�C2004 (frequency matched on age, sex, geographical remoteness). We compared clinical and treatment data (Pearson's chi-square) and all-cause and cancer survival (Cox regression analysis). Indigenous patients with CRC were not significantly more likely to have comorbidity, advanced disease at diagnosis or less treatment than non-Indigenous people. There was also no statistically significant difference in all-cause survival (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.69, 1.89) or cancer survival (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.60, 1.69) between the two groups.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Notekey15</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>