Voir la source de Gemcitabine : The Super Relaxation!

Then, we have conducted a statistical analysis to evaluate the performance of the three language onset time groups (EL, TL, and DL) in the associative test (Naming and Matching task). Table ?Table33 reported the raw score of the sample distributed in language onset time. A 3 �� 2 MANOVA showed differences between language onset time groups in semantic tasks [F(4,140) = 2.94; p = 0.02, and ��2 = 0.78]. The Post hoc analysis (Tukey test) evidenced different performance between language onset groups only in the Matching task: the EL group��s scores were lower than TL (p  in Matching task. ??statistically significant. Besides, a 3 (language [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/birinapant-tl32711.html Birinapant] onset time groups) �� 3 (age groups) �� 4 (types of semantic associations: function, part/whole, contiguity, and superordinate) MANOVA showed a significant difference among the age groups [F(8,124) = 2.3; p [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Gemcitabine-Hydrochloride(Gemzar).html find more] associative performance of children with different language onset time (Figure ?Figure55). FIGURE 5 Representation of the Matching task performance by age and language onset groups. Finally, we have analyzed the execution time (t) of sample in Naming and Matching taskes. A 3 (EL, TL, and DL groups) �� 3 (age groups) �� 2 (t Naming and Matching tasks) MANOVA evidenced significant differences in language onset time groups [F(4,128) = 2.7; p [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megestrol_acetate Megestrol Acetate] on age groups performance evidenced the older children (4- and 5-year-olds) faster than younger (3-year-olds) (t Naming: p